Thirty-five crores wasted on Tinkoon bridge, a brand new contract for the development of the bridge was to be constructed three years in the past.

Thirty-five crores wasted on Tinkoon bridge, a new contract for the construction of the bridge was to be built three years ago.


23 August, Kathmandu. A brand new contract is to be signed for the development of a bridge over the Bagmati River in Tinkune, Kathmandu. The Kathmandu Road Extension Project underneath the Road Department goes to take the contract for the development of the bridge which has been closed for 4 years. Bids have been invited for this.

The work was stopped after the federal government detected severe negligence and delay within the building of the bridge at a price of Rs 35 million. The buy settlement with Pappu was canceled in December 2076 as the corporate refused to rectify the error and proceed with the work.

The contract was terminated 5 years after the settlement was reached after building of the 170-metre-wide Bagmati Bridge at Tinkyun in Kathmandu was not as per design.

As really useful by the challenge, Pappu Construction has been blacklisted by the Public Procurement Monitoring Office for 3 years with impact from February 2076.

Why was the contract damaged?

The Development Committee of Parliament had inspected the bridge on June 20 and ready a examine report. The examine carried out by the committee additionally revealed that there was a severe defect within the pile of the bridge. The examine report confirmed that the design was accepted to construct 16 (twelve hundred mm) piles of 29.5 m depth (size) however just one pile of 16.5 m was constructed and two piles had been torn down. The committee had directed to take motion in opposition to the development sellers who disobeyed the directions and the involved our bodies for not making well timed clearances.

The Kathmandu Valley Road Extension Project directed building professionals to proceed solely after resolving the issue of piles within the foundations after severe flaws had been present in three foundations of the under-construction bridge.

However, the challenge broke the contract after Pappu Construction disobeyed the directive and ready the slab slope by setting up a sub-structure of the bridge. Earlier, the corporate was accused of laying slabs on the bridge over the Bishnumati river connecting Teku and Kalimati. The bridge has not been working for a very long time.

Guru Adhikari, head of the Kathmandu highway extension challenge, stated the contract was damaged and a brand new contract was signed after the way forward for the bridge over the Bagmati river, which ought to have been accomplished inside three-and-a-half years.

“Only the foundations on the north side of the right bank of the Bagmati bridge prepared by Pappu will be used,” he stated, including that “the brand new contractor should take away the remaining three foundations.

The challenge has additionally written a letter to Pappu stating that he should pay Rs 5 crore as compensation for breaking the settlement. However, the contractor Pappu Construction has approached the Supreme Court in opposition to this resolution of the federal government.

Pappu Construction commenced the development work of the challenge on 19 December 2008 by signing an settlement with the Kathmandu Valley Road Extension Project to finish the development by 20 July 2075 BS. The basis stone of the Bagmati bridge has not been laid because the arch bridge at Bijulibazar, which was contracted just a few months in the past, is nearly two years outdated.

Pappu’s personal declare

However, Pappu stated that the choice taken by the challenge was not correct. The firm says that it has given directions to demolish the muse of the bridge opposite to the choice taken by the highway division itself.

The firm claims that the division has agreed to decrease the cap by utilizing one-and-a-half ton iron rods within the pillars as soil was swept away after a 16-feet slope through the building of one of many 64 piles of the 4 foundations. Why the bridge? However, an worker of the development firm claimed that after the challenge ordered the demolition of the muse, it was improperly really useful to interrupt the contract and put it on the blacklist.

The firm claims that the division offered the map late, didn’t take well timed initiative to get the police workplace off the bottom, didn’t take away the electrical energy poles and ingesting water pipes in time and didn’t pay for the work.


Source: OnlineKhabar

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *